MAD PROPHET, MAD PROFIT: JOHN GIANVITO x3

Boston-based filmmaker and former Harvard Film Archive curator John Gianvito had made a few films before the 20th century became the 21st, but he would wind up emerging as one of the definitive filmmakers of the current century during its first decade. His six years of work on Gulf War I cri de cœur The Mad Songs of Fernanda Hussein wound up serving as one of the definitive commentaries on the upcoming century when it premiered in 2001. Mad Songs served as a work of inadvertent commentary on the bloodlust spurred by the Twin Tower attacks, and the Gulf War II that was going to come about as a result. It was also a work of intensely personal cinephilia-inspired curation: Griffith- and Wyler-adjacent structuring of multiple war-at-home storylines was melded with archival footage and performance documentary, resulting in a bold and sprawling hybrid work. Despite fierce advocacy from notable champions in Chantal Akerman, Peter Watkins, Jonathan Rosenbaum, and Dennis Lim, it was not an easy film to see in 2001 and it has not gotten much easier since. He’d take another six years to make his next film, this time decidedly aimed at the domestic. Profit Motive and the Whispering Wind (2007) was a film whose more minimalist scale and running time didn’t reduce its power. Its simultaneously rousing and despairing analysis, courtesy of Howard Zinn, marked a turn towards a more domestic issue: how America eats its rabble rousers but leaves a tribute to them later. The groundwork laid by the champions of Mad Songs resulted in Profit Motive finding more of an audience, and it subsequently being named the Best Experimental Film of 2007 by the National Society of Film Critics.

Spectacle is pleased to present Gianvito’s two features of the 2000s in collaboration with Gianvito himself, who suggested a third title to accompany the present moment where America’s leaders are once again burning down the Middle East for money while punishing its own citizens for speaking up. The omnibus film Far From Afghanistan (2012), conceptualized and edited by Gianvito as a follow-up to the Chris Marker-led Far From Vietnam (1967), finds him and four other directors turning their attentions to the Afghanistan War during its peak years. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Special thanks to John Gianvito, Mark Rance (Watchmaker Films), and Ryan Krivoshey/Kazu Watanabe (Grasshopper Film).

THE MAD SONGS OF FERNANDA HUSSEIN
Dir. John Gianvito, 2001
United States. 168 min.
In English.

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3 – 7 PM
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 8 – 7:30 PM
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22 – 7:30 PM [$10 SPECIAL EVENT – John Gianvito post-film Q&A]
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30 – 7 PM

TICKETS

Shot and largely set in the Santa Fe desert, three stories linked to the first Gulf War unfold: a Mexican-American mother with the married last name Hussein is persecuted for it, a young soldier who’s finished his tour of duty in the Gulf struggles to adjust back to civilian life, and a teenager begins to reckon with what’s going on abroad. Alongside these storylines are images of the Santa Fe desert, CNN and Pentagon propaganda, archival footage, images of war memorabilia, and concert footage of the Iraqi musician Naseer Shamma.

“By virtue of being nonprofessional, Gianvito is free to mix documentary with fiction, a love for silent cinema and landscape (he works as associate curator for the Harvard Film Archive, and also teaches — a fact reflected in his cameo in the film) with music (most notably, extended passages by Iraqi musician Naseer Shemma commemorating some of the war’s victims) and dialogue, a taste for blistering satire (in the remarkable sequence devoted to war toys) as well as convulsive and cathartic tragic lyricism (in the extraordinary final sequence, at once tribal and experimental in its poetic meditation on ritualistic violence). Ironically, with an almost Whitmanesque inclusiveness and restlessness, he can make me feel proud to be an American again.” – Jonathan Rosenbaum

“Six years and 13 credit cards in the making, John Gianvito’s The Mad Songs of Fernanda Hussein stands as a rebuke to the cost-benefit models that have come to dominate American independent filmmaking. After hearing first-hand accounts from students who had served in the Persian Gulf, Gianvito says he became ‘inarticulate with rage. I needed an outlet for that energy.’ In the summer of 1994, he drove to New Mexico with $17,000 in hand. He chose the location for the visual rhyme that the Southwestern deserts provided and for the state’s concentration of military bases, but also because ‘it apparently had a higher proportion of Gulf War veterans than any other state.’ He rented a room, made friends in the activist community, and wrote a script in two weeks. Principal photography stretched over two years and three trips from Cambridge. The cast was assembled from amateur theater troupe members and by approaching people in the street. The crew came together with the help of the local film commission: ‘Besides me, everyone behind the camera is from New Mexico.’”– Dennis Lim

“If I would have to write an article on THE MAD SONGS OF FERNANDA HUSSEIN, I would call it – The Silence and the Fury, or rather – the Silence and the Horror. What was for me the most striking and the most moving was the silence, the silence which leaves room to the other, to the spectator facing the muted horror, and then I wanted to say that silently we start to love this filmmaker, who doesn’t make any noise, a kind of “saint” I feel like saying. Someone who doesn’t calculate, doesn’t make any fuss, any effect and takes you by the hand to make you feel something with him. He says come, look, listen. And we do.” – Chantal Akerman

PROFIT MOTIVE AND THE WHISPERING WIND
Dir. John Gianvito, 2007
United States. 58 min.
No dialogue (English writing).

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3 – 10 PM
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 11 – 10 PM
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22 – 5 PM
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30 – 10 PM

TICKETS

A visual meditation on the progressive history of the United States as seen through cemeteries, historic plaques and markers. Inspired by Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States.

“Let’s start with the title — a shotgun marriage between two omnipresent yet far from equally featured players in these unremarked, meditative spaces: an abstract impulse that supposedly keeps our American republic healthy and vital (while producing a lot of junk along with more helpful items) and a concrete force softly caresses everything in its path, keeping us alive and alert. More specifically, an encounter between the cause of many of the deaths that are being commemorated here — especially those relating to the genocide of Native Americans and many of the massacres occasioned by slave revolts and labor protests — and what D.W. Griffith lamented he found missing from modern cinema, the wind in the trees, found in the vicinity of most of the dozens of gravesites visited.” – Jonathan Rosenbaum

“Gianvito’s leftist vision is righteously ecumenical, encompassing Eugene V. Debs and Frank Little, Sojourner Truth and Malcolm X, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Cesar Chavez, and many, many others whom mainstream historical accounts have buried far more comprehensively than their undertakers. In addition to forging a radical remapping of the American terrain, Gianvito’s film provides its audience with the rare opportunity to pay our respects by proxy. At a time when most attempts at political cinema result in the equivalent of hastily xeroxed leaflets, Gianvito has produced a document, one we will no doubt be examining for years to come.” – Michael Sicinski

“His camera is still, locked off in the spirit of James Benning, as he looks, testifying with the lens to the so little remembered sacrifices and struggles across the centuries. The steadiness of the gaze, and the silence of the acknowledgement, in the shadow of industrial parks, shopping centres and busy highways, only increases the sense of the lived and vocal histories being noted. When we are with the dead, we are quiet for a reason. We are with them to listen, to hear their voices raised, their feet on public asphalt, they who were not quiet, who did not sink beneath the waves without their song. And the fixity of the camera, against the fleeting business nearby, again acknowledges the endurance of their example.” – Gareth Evans

FAR FROM AFGHANISTAN
Dir. John Gianvito/Jon Jost/Soon-Mi Yoo/Minda Martin/Travis Wilkerson, 2012
United States. 129 min.
In English, and Pashto/Dari with English subtitles.

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5 – 7 PM
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 11 – 7 PM
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 15 – 5 PM
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 28 – 5 PM

TICKETS

Five accomplished, politically progressive film-makers come together to raise the collective consciousness about the U.S. war in Afghanistan, officially the longest war in U.S. history. Inspired by the 1967 collaborative undertaking Loin du Vietnam [Far From Vietnam], Far from Afghanistan explores, through a mosaic of approaches, issues of shared responsibility, history and memory – all in a concerted effort to help accelerate political resistance to the war.

“When American filmmaker, programmer and teacher John Gianvito resolved to make a multivocal feature modelled after Loin du Vietnam last year, the war in Afghanistan was approaching its tenth anniversary, surpassing Vietnam as the longest overseas conflict in American history. Where Loin du Vietnam was a series of manifestos intended to place an array of perspectives on the war in dialogue with each other, Far from Afghanistan exposes a prevailing sense of individual alienation and helplessness in the face of a seemingly interminable war.

Gianvito’s opening segment ‘My Heart Swims in Blood’ contrasts scenes of American daily life with voiceovers reporting Afghan casualties and facts about the war. Jon Jost’s ‘Empire’s Cross’ unfolds wordlessly at first, with the familiar image of a plane crashing into a tower. Soon-Mi Yoo’s ‘Afghanistan: The Next Generation’ juxtaposes scenes of Afghans from American propaganda made during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan with scenes of contemporary Afghan life. Minda Martin’s ‘The Long Distance Operator,’ Far from Afghanistan’s sole fictional narrative, shows two soldiers directing a bomber plane over Afghanistan from a control base in the States. Travis Wilkerson’s closing segment ‘Fragments of Dissolution,’ filmed in high-contrast black and white, listens to the stories of four American women: two relatives of soldiers who have committed suicide, and two relatives of victims of fires caused by illegal electricity hook-ups.” – Aaron Cutler & Mariana Shellard

“It’s central to Gianvito’s overall achievement to make and illustrate connections between diverse topics that are far from obvious; indeed, coping with disconnection — the Marker theme par excellence — is in many ways the driving force behind the film.” – Jonathan Rosenbaum

“…brilliant, poetic and cold as it should be. I was blown away by it, and by the relentlessness of its exploration.” – Fanny Howe

GRIPPED BY HYSTERIA: ISHMAEL BERNAL x3

While the brutal dictatorship and resulting censorship of the Philippines’ Ferdinand Marcos regime ought to have smothered the country’s film industry throughout the 1970s and 80s, it wound up producing what is now referred to as The Second Golden Age of Philippines Cinema. The country was lucky enough to have a libertarian-inclined censorship office head, and most of the boundary-pushing films of that era did well enough financially and critically to allow for the Marcos regime to accept a certain amount of cinematic criticism. Nevertheless, it still wouldn’t have been called a Golden Age without directors such as Lino Brocka, Kidlat Tahimik, and Mike De Leon all managing to push boundaries via their own forms of melodrama, docufiction, social realism, and more.

Despite being considered the second-most important Filipino director after Brocka in his home country, the work of Second Golden Age director Ishmael Bernal has not been screened as often abroad in recent years, in part due to print scarcity. Notorious for his sharp wit, the openly gay Bernal was a subversive ironist and a committed feminist. His films frequently used the roles of women to skewer what he saw as a sick society under the Marcos regime, best summed up by a line from his provocatively-titled essay Why The Martial Law Will Affect Your Sex Life: “Here we are, being practically ruled by a stranger who shall parade the chills and fevers of his ego and what are we going to do about it? We are going to be gripped by hysteria, that’s what.” This attitude culminated in the consensus pick for his masterpiece, Himala (1982), a study of the blind faith of the Philippines and the grip of hysteria that comes with it – it has only been vindicated with the country’s election of another Ferdinand Marcos to the Presidency. Bernal has subsequently remained a touchstone for the two key figures from the subsequent Third Golden Age: Spectacle favorites Lav Diaz and Raya Martin.

Spectacle is pleased to announce a partial retrospective of some of Bernal’s best-known work from the heart of the Second Golden Age, showing in rarely-screened 2K/4K restorations to allow for a new appreciation of why Bernal’s contributions to Filipino cinema are considered some of the country’s boldest and best.

Special thanks to Thellie Castro-Palanisamy & Cathrina Lim-Achacoso (ABS-CBN).

A SPECK IN THE WATER
(NUNAL SA TUBIG)
Dir. Ishmael Bernal, 1976.
Philippines. 118 min.
In Tagalog with English subtitles.

THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 3 – 7:30 PM
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 19 – 10 PM [w/ intro]
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 25 – 5 PM

TICKETS

SPECIAL INTRO by filmmaker Isabel Sandoval (Lingua Franca, Moonglow) on September 19th!

This film has hardcoded Japanese subtitles due to the 2K restoration being based off the sole extant 35mm print.

In the impoverished village of Santa Fe, some investors capitalize on fish pens growing bangus (milkfish) under the care of Mang Pedro (Ruben Rustia). But for some mysterious reason, the fish are dying. To save the situation, they decide to salt the fish and dry them under the sun. Benjamin (George Estregan), who owns a boat that shuttles passengers to town, has a regular passenger Chedeng (Daria Ramirez), who is going to be a midwife soon. Chedeng has a close friend and neighbor, Maria (Elizabeth Oropesa), but unknown to each other, they are both having an affair with Benjamin. When Maria becomes pregnant, she becomes Chedeng’s first patient and a disastrous situation that ends in tragedy ensues.

“A Speck in the Water reappears as one of the most personal early works by Bernal, when he was most assured and daring in his innovative style. Today, it looks like a forgotten masterpiece, but at the time of release, the film was very unevenly received by local film critics. Some of them said it was ‘un-Filipino,’ and even [that it looked] ‘French!’ However, as one sharp critic, Hernando, wrote: ‘Nunal sa Tubig is so well crafted, complex, sharp, and to a certain degree, abstruse, that the film requires complete concentration and openness to a new film concept, and, whenever necessary, a willingness to see it again.’” – Max Tessier

TISOY!
Dir. Ishmael Bernal, 1977.
Philippines. 120 min.
In Tagalog with English subtitles.

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 4 – MIDNIGHT
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9 – 7:30 PM
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 19 – 7:30 PM

TICKETS

Based on a popular comic strip by Nonoy Marcelo, Tisoy (Christopher de Leon) is a bohemian balikbayan [Filipino term for repatriate] searching for his father. He gets help from his friends as they scour the immaculately clean Metro Manila as well as reunite him with his high-school sweetheart.

“Bernal, taking a momentary step away from the melodramas he specialized in, used [the comics] to create a story full of gags, hidden social metaphors, and meta-jokes. To say that Tisoy! is as straightforward narratively as the synopsis makes it seem would be a lie. It’s a mosaic of stories and characters which, despite being connected to one another, would be able to stand strongly on their own. Above all, Tisoy! is a satire made during the time of martial law. When cinema served as a tool against the government, Bernal used it to not only criticize the situation – fancy menu items while most of the country was impoverished due to the rapid urbanization, or streets that apparently weren’t as clean as he portrayed them – but also to mock other films made during that time.” – Magdalena Nieświec

HIMALA
(MIRACLE)
Dir. Ishmael Bernal, 1982.
Philippines. 124 min.
In Tagalog with English subtitles.

SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 6 – 5 PM
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 12 – 10 PM
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22 – 7:30 PM

TICKETS

When plain orphan Elsa (Nora Aunor) begins having visions of the Virgin Mary, the rest of the residents of her isolated village find themselves questioning their own beliefs and values. Soon, Elsa is healing people with a variety of ailments. As word of this phenomenon spreads, tourists, pilgrims, patients and a documentary filmmaker all arrive on a quest to partake in the miracle.

“Bernal himself described the film as ‘…not just the story of a couple of characters. It is also the story of a society. And that is Himala. What I show in Himala is the picture of a society that is ill. A society which has no recourse but to cling to apparitions and miracles. It is not important if there really was a miracle or not. What is important is the need of a people to believe.’” – ABS-CBN

“Web site users voted to award the late Filipino director Ishmael Bernal’s film the top prize in the CNN APSA Viewers Choice Award for Best Asia-Pacific Film of All Time, edging Akira Kurosawa’s acknowledged classic Seven Samurai into second place.” – Fei Phoon

MUSIK-KINO-DRAMA: RICHARD WAGNER x2

Despite his conception of the Gesamtkunstwerk (‘total work of art’), Richard Wagner died shortly before the inception of cinema, thus ensuring that any future Gesamtkunstwerks would have at least one more art form to potentially incorporate than he ever did. While many a film score’s use of leitmotifs would eventually grow out of his wake, cinematic adaptations of Wagner musikdramas (or, for that matter, any opera) are rarer on the ground. Attending the 150th anniversary of the Bayreuth Festival may be out of reach for most people reading this description, but Spectacle is pleased to offer a chance to see two rarely-screened Wagner kino adaptations. A one-time film director adapts the first mature Wagner work in Joachim Herz’s 1964 East German production of THE FLYING DUTCHMAN, and an arthouse legend adapts the last in Hans-Jürgen Syberberg’s 1982 West German production of PARSIFAL. Despite the contrasts, both utilize all the possibilities of cinema to create Gesamtkunstwerks for a post-Wagner world – right down to both needing to reckon with how his anti-Semitism had influenced the Nazis. Channel your inner Ludwig II and be a patron of Wagner’s arts this August at Spectacle.

Special thanks to Ruben Schwaben (DEFA Film Library) and Viviana Kammel (Filmgalerie 451).

 

 

THE FLYING DUTCHMAN
(DER FLIEGENDE HOLLÄNDER)
Dir. Joachim Herz, 1964
East Germany. 101 min.
In German with English subtitles.

SATURDAY, AUGUST 8 – 5 PM
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 12 – 7:30 PM
FRIDAY, AUGUST 21 – 7:30 PM
SATURDAY, AUGUST 29 – 10 PM

TICKETS

In order to escape her narrow and restrictive life, Senta, the daughter of a rich shipowner, seeks refuge in her fantasies and dreams. In this realm of imagination, a bold and restless sea captain appears to her—the Flying Dutchman—who is cursed to wander the seas forever. In her obsessive dreams, Senta frees this man through her love for him.

“The only East German film to include elements of horror and vampire genres, The Flying Dutchman was the first complete Wagner opera ever made on film. The script clearly separated the real from the imaginary; in the original 35mm format, this was reflected visually by changing the image size—from Academy ratio for reality, to wide-screen for fantasy. The film was produced with a groundbreaking 4-channel magnetic soundtrack.” – DEFA Film Library

“DEFA’s The Flying Dutchman is considered the first attempt to film a Wagner opera in its entirety, although, in point of fact, it too reworks the story to suit both the cinematic medium and the political viewpoint of the GDR. It was directed by opera director Joachim Herz, who, perhaps because it was his first (and only) film, opted to experiment with state-of-the-art sound and film techniques. Director Herz dramatically changes Wagner’s opera from one about a ghostly event to the reveries of a young woman named Senta who is infatuated with the story of the Flying Dutchman. To separate reality from Senta’s imagination, Mr. Herz uses two different film aspect ratios. Whenever we are watching Anna in the real world, the aspect ratio is [in 1.67:1]. When the film shifts to Senta’s dream world, the screen slowly opens up to the 2.35:1 dimensions of DEFA’s Totalvision (the same as Cinemascope). In other films that use multiple aspect ratios, the change in screen aspect is handled as edits, but Herz wanted these switches in perspective to flow like the film’s lush score. To do this required sophisticated in-camera techniques involving animation frames and an American Mitchell camera that accepted double reels. This process meant that everything had to be shot with the larger format while the animation frame was simultaneously running through the camera. That this worked at all is a testament to cinematographer Erich Gusko’s skill with a camera.” – Jim Morton

PARSIFAL
Dir. Hans-Jürgen Syberberg, 1982
West Germany, France. 245 min.
In German with English subtitles.

SATURDAY, AUGUST 29 – 5 PM

EVENT TICKETS ($5)

Please note that this film does NOT feature an intermission.

A psychological interpretation of the opera mixing in references to the history of Germany, Wagner’s life, German literature and philosophy. The action is centered on Wagner’s death mask. Syberberg’s version was made on the one hundredth anniversary of the opera’s first performance at Bayreuth in 1882. As in his earlier films, Syberberg shot his Parsifal completely in-studio.

“It’s as if Wagner’s hypnotic allure and Brecht’s intellectualized alienation have been somehow mystically united.” – John Rockwell

“Unlike the Ring or Der Meistersinger von Nürnberg, which were both gleefully embraced by the Nazi Party as expressions of good German nationalism, Parsifal already had a contended status among the upper-level Nazis: it was never “banned”-banned, but it was withheld from being produced at Bayreuth starting with the 1940 festival (that is, the first one after the outbreak of World War II), despite having been produced at the festival every year of the opera’s existence other than 1896. The obsession with Christology, the focus on spiritual and religious transcendence, and the embrace of non-violence and the rejection of earthly power all contributed to the opera being viewed with some suspicion by Nazi leadership, including, if we are to trust the word of Joseph Goebbels, Hitler himself. Which is perhaps part of why Syberberg picked it as the capstone to his ‘unwieldy epic-length cinematic dissections of Germany history’ project: the opera is in a paradoxical space, at once tainted by Nazism (as all Wagner operas pretty much have to be), and yet untainted by Nazism (because it was the one Wagner opera that made the Nazis nervous).” – Timothy Brayton

PAINTING SHADOW CALLIGRAPHY – THE SHORT FILMS OF BRUCE WOOD

During his 22 years teaching at the Art Institute of Chicago, the legendary experimental filmmaker Stan Brakhage helped many filmmakers find their own voice. The best of them would produce work that would thankfully avoid being too closely linked to his inescapable influence on the American avant-garde, including such important filmmakers as Bill Brand, Louis Hock, Marjorie Keller, and Saul Levine. One of the lesser-known names to emerge from the Chicago scene was Bruce Wood, a Massachusetts-based painter whose love of Brakhage’s classic Window Water Baby Moving and the animated films of Robert Breer had him specifically coming to the Institute to study under Brakhage. After a five-year period of prolific filmmaking in the 1970s that led to greater recognition in Europe than in the United States, he largely returned to painting and subsequent work as an art dealer.

Wood’s almost entirely black-and-white body of cinematic work both predates the B&W works of the better-known Andrew Noren, and suggests an alternative route for monochromatic abstraction that is closer to Franz Kline’s paintings and a private form of calligraphy than conventional photography. His use of multiple exposures and superimpositions, rescaling images, and single-frame manipulations turn initially realistic imagery into sensual shadow motions. Spectacle is pleased to announce the first-ever complete retrospective of Bruce Wood’s 16mm short films, with all titles projected on 16mm, and with Wood in attendance for introductions and Q&As.

Co-programmed with Forrest Sprague. Special thanks to Bruce Wood and The Film-Makers’ Cooperative.

 

PROGRAM 1: EMERGING FROM THE SHADOWS
SATURDAY, JULY 18 – 5 PM (w/ Intro by Bruce Wood)

PROGRAM 1 TICKETS

ACE NUMBER 5 (RED VERSION)
1974, United States.
8 min, 16mm.
Silent.

This program of Bruce Wood’s earliest works consists of a rare (and deliberately) red copy of his debut film ACE Number 5. “The breakthrough which led to the rest of them.” – Bruce Wood

LATEX SKY
1975, United States.
8 min, 16mm.
Silent.

“Throughout the sequence of films, a certain tension is maintained by oscillating around the border between what is abstract and what can be referred back to its source – a concern which is reflected in Wood’s choice of [titles:] ‘Latex Sky,’ for example.” – Jeremy Spencer

RIVER OF STARS
1975, United States.
10 min, 16mm.
Silent.

“…as if one were participating in the physical act of painting itself…one feels the sensation of the applying of strokes in black and white, of various feathery textural layers…There is tremendous variety of patterns. They blend effortlessly one into the other through a constant variety of means.” – Bob Cowan

1975 SKETCHES
1975, United States.
3 min, 16mm.
Silent.

BRAND NEW PRINT!

Spectacle is pleased to showcase a newly struck print of a Bruce Wood sketch reel featuring both color and B&W material.

ARCTIC DESIRE
1976, United States.
7 min, 16mm.
Silent.

“Almost without exception both hard vibrating abstract images and softer, slower, sustained images exist within the one film but one may well overcome the other as, for instance, in ‘Arctic Desire’ where the latter predominate.” – Jeremy Spencer

SILVER TRACES
1976, United States.
6 min, 16mm.
Silent.

AIRLESS PASSAGE
1976, United States.
13 min, 16mm.
Silent.

“[Films such as] ‘Silver Traces’ and ‘Airless Passage’ in particular deal more with the assembling of images within time and the resultant superimpositions, some lattice-like, others which tease the eye from one layer to another: but most interesting are those which, especially in ‘Silver Traces,’ appear to interact with the film surface itself.” – Jeremy Spencer

TRT: 55 min + reel changes

 

PROGRAM 2: BRIDGES AND PASSAGES
SATURDAY, JULY 18 – 7:30 PM (w/ Intro by Bruce Wood)

PROGRAM 2 TICKETS

ISLAND DESIGN
1976, United States.
6 min, 16mm.
Silent.

“In the later films, ‘Island Design’ and ‘Molten Shadow,’ it is the assemblage [of images] over time which has become more important.” – Jeremy Spencer

EDGE FORCES
1976, United States.
11 min, 16mm.
Silent.

“EDGE FORCES is an abstract collage of rapid nebulous forms and calligraphic lines. The frame is used as a “canvas” for thousands of fleeting images that try to expand beyond its confines. Viewers are compelled either to comprehend the dynamic flow of the images, or to make free subjective associations with them.” – Bruce Wood

MOLTEN SHADOW
1976, United States.
8 min, 16mm.
Silent.

THE BRIDGE OF HEAVEN
1977, United States.
32 min, 16mm.
Silent.

“THE BRIDGE OF HEAVEN features elements both starkly structural (frames in frames, grids, x’s, A-frames) and sensually dancing (swirling clouds of grain, creeping white suggestive blobs).” – Josh Mabe

TRT: 57 min + reel changes

 

PROGRAM 3: FLYING INTO THE VOID
SUNDAY, JULY 19 – 5 PM (w/ Bruce Wood Q&A following screening)

PROGRAM 3 TICKETS

THE SMELL OF DEATH
1977, United States.
16 min, 16mm.
Silent.

“The probable masterpiece of the night is THE SMELL OF DEATH. The film alternates between three modes. First, the slowly fading image of an “X”–suggestive of a failing system (medical equipment? the body?). Then skeletal fingers caressing the surface of the film (from the viewpoint of the dying’s last sense of this world? or of the dying’s reaching out onto the next?). Finally, stuttering torn pulses of light–something like flesh being destroyed. It’s a great film–and perfectly encapsulates Wood’s talent for giving a fully formed world born of simply Black and White.” – Josh Mabe

FROZEN FLIGHT
1977, United States.
33 min, 16mm.
Silent.

“Many of Wood’s individual frames also involve several different overlays of separate exposures. He really is most crucially involved with producing the virtuoso ‘moment.’ It’s an understatement to say that his [film Frozen Flight], whose…33 minutes’ running time juxtapose[s] hundreds of these complex, hinged-together compositions, [is] overloaded with startling, intense, undeveloped information.” – C.L. Morrison

BETWEEN GLANCES
1978, United States.
14 min, 16mm.
Silent.

“Brakhage’s influence can be felt most keenly in BETWEEN GLANCES which (only half-jokingly) seems like an expression of “closed-eye vision” from inside of one of Warhol’s Silver Clouds.” – Josh Mabe

TRT: 63 min + reel changes

UNEARTHLY POETIC VISIONS: A WILL HINDLE ENCORE

The colorful, quirky style that is associated with the members of the West Coast experimental film scene has long been defined by the foundational work of Bruce Baillie, Robert Nelson, and Pat O’Neill. Despite being every bit as critical to that scene’s origins and their subversions of New Age aesthetics, the small body of work that Will Hindle (1929-87) left behind has frequently resulted in many of his 11 films being far more discussed than seen. The increasing rarity of prints in good condition has further contributed to a certain obscurity, despite praise from writers such as Amos Vogel and Gene Youngblood. Happily, the breadth and depth of his work has experienced something of a revival in appreciation, with Joshua Minsoo Kim of Tone Glow putting together the first complete retrospective of Hindle’s filmography, Unknown Nostalgia, at Chicago’s Sweet Void Cinema in December 2024. Spectacle followed suit with their own complete retrospective, Unearthly Poetic Visions, in July 2025.

Spectacle is pleased to bring back a 6-film sampler of Will Hindle’s films due to collective demand for another dip into the pool. Whether you saw these films previously or not, it’s likely that this might be the last chance for New Yorkers to see the only good print of Watersmith in existence for quite a while, along with the rarity of theatrical screenings for his other titles. Come on in, the water’s fine.

Co-programmed by Andrew Reichel and Giovanni Santia. Special thanks to Joshua Minsoo Kim, Mark Toscano, Canyon Cinema, the Film-Makers’ Cooperative, and Lynne Sachs.

SATURDAY, JUNE 13 – 5:15 PM
SUNDAY, JUNE 14 – 5:15 PM

BUY TICKETS

NON CATHOLICAM
1963. United States.
10 min. 16mm.

Soundtrack by Paul Hindemith. Cinematography assistance from Bruce Baillie.

“In 1958, Will Hindle shot, edited, and printed a film called Catholicam, which does not seem to have been circulated. He returned to this film in 1963, re-edited and augmented it with additional material, and released it as Non Catholicam.” – Mark Toscano

“Another granddaddy of the American Personal Film movement. Set to the music of Hindemith, filmed entirely in a Gothic cathedral and edited to precision counter-point. An almost somber beginning that rises to brilliant exaltation. As with Pastorale, extremely innovative for its day and even now. Entire film was an ‘optical print’ to retain light nuances.” – Canyon Cinema

FFFTCM
1967. United States.
5 min. 16mm.

AKA Fanfare for the Common Man. Music by Aaron Copland.

“Renewed income and the ability to work on one’s own produced this feeling and work. A Promethean awakening, de-bonding of the human spirit … reaching for the unfiltered blaze of Light and Life. The driving sounds of heart beat, fanfare for the Common Man and devotional chants. A time of sharing … a touch of vision in the night.” – Canyon Cinema

“FFFTCM arrived in mid-1967, and it was like a 180-degree turn. It was a film that bet violently on life… for being, for advancement, for the right to look for and get a job. It didn’t look like it was going to be distributed, but a review by Lenny Lipton helped and they bought it. More than one person has told me that they see it as an orgasmic movie. In his new book, R. Pike, from Creative Films, says it’s a movie about ‘male masturbation.’” – Will Hindle

CHINESE FIREDRILL
1968. United States.
25 min. 16mm.

Cinematography assistance by John Luther Schofill.

“Hindle’s prize-laden work of cataclysmic visual and mental schisms stands as one-of-a-kind. Human universals crammed into a moment (infinity?) in one small enclosure (the universe?). The identifying viewer will judge.” – Canyon Cinema

“Many people appear in the movie (again, it’s like a first time), but very briefly, in the manner of memories or visions. The film focuses on the whirlpool of the room/cell/universe in which a Hungarian gypsy lives. And there is a disjunction. The editing will take the film even further. The Savage 1967.” – Will Hindle

BILLABONG
1968. United States.
9 min. 16mm.

“Winner of the main prize of the Oberhausen (Germany) International Film Festival, Billabong has gone on to even greater acclaim than its much-awarded predecessor. Now in collections and archives on three continents, Billabong … mates verité camera and violently creative and master editing … revealing the mood of youths contained by the government. On location in Oregon. Empathetic in the extreme.” – Canyon Cinema

“A remarkably intimate and at times palpably erotic study of boys in a Job Corps camp on the Oregon coast, Billabong is a sensuously humanist encounter with alienated youth, told in the filmmaker’s trademark undulating lap dissolves and scintillatingly grainy high contrasts. Loneliness and longing-for-elsewhere alternate with horseplay and horniness, and hijinks around urinals and pool tables culminate in an ecstatic moment of onanistic release.” – Chuck Stephens

WATERSMITH
1969. United States.
32 min. 16mm.

“Perhaps Hindle’s magnum opus to date. New York Times critic Vincent Canby calls Watersmith ‘beautiful abstract patterns of lines of energy. A kind of ode to physical grace.’ A deceptively ‘calm’ film requiring an equally calm audience and a superior soundtrack reproduction system, Watersmith weaves its lone visual threads closer and closer until the screen is awash with multiple levels of artistic achievement, technical supremacy, physical and mental demands and rewards … for the relaxed and receptive viewer. Not a flash and funk work. A film to be seen again and again.” – Canyon Cinema

“Watersmith is a mind movie. Hindle turns his film into a celebration of the freedom of bodies moving through water, the implacable grace of human forms freed from gravity. It ripples between reality and abstraction. There hasn’t been a movie quite like this since Leni Riefenstahl’s Olympia.” – Entertainment World

“‘I was photographing champion swimmers,’ Hindle said of the Olympic athletes he shot, ‘and I wanted to be a champion filmer.’” – Joshua Minsoo Kim

SAINT FLOURNOY LOBOS-LOGOS AND THE EASTERN EUROPE FETUS TAXING JAPAN BRIDES IN WEST COAST PLACES SUCKING ALABAMA AIR
1970. United States.
12 min. 16mm.

“Presaging details and intent of Charles Manson’s cult and actions was not meant to be one of this film’s greater attributes. It was, however, filmed uncannily months before the facts were known. The resemblance is oblique. The film: the mysticism of a ‘calling,’ a journey to be made, a vision in mid-desert to behold and oneness with it all. Filmed in Death Valley.” – Canyon Cinema

“The title of celebrated ’70s experimental-filmmaking mainstay and current cine-avant-garde Invisible Man Will Hindle’s Saint Flournoy Lobos-Logos and the Eastern Europe Fetus Taxing Japan Brides in West Coast Places Sucking Alabama Air (1970) is almost impossible to remember. The film itself—a gorgeously photographed, fluidly edited slice of fin de siècle ’60s love and dread, shot largely in Death Valley, and both of the Manson Family moment and altogether adrift in time—is impossible to forget. In it, a shirtless bearded dude in flour-sack yoga pants treks and stumbles barefoot through the white-hot desert, pausing occasionally to assume the lotus position and radiate silent “om”s into the shimmering heat—Gus Van Sant’s Gerry (2002) as one man show. Dude might be ‘Saint Flournoy Lobos-Logos’ (whoever that is), we’re never really sure. The ‘Eastern Europe Fetus’ shows up, “crawling” through a fiery mandala in some indeterminate space and looking like a cross between 2001: A Space Odyssey’s (1968) star child and one of those hideous little edible chocolate babies. There are lens flares and eclipse halos, dude’s supple movements mesmerizingly match cut and complexly lap-dissolved one into the next, and there are more dudes, and nudes, dancing on balconies to bongos and the tinkling of ice cubes in drink glasses echoing down through the canyon…then the orange slash of a shadow-play knife in the night.” – Chuck Stephens

TRT: 93 min + reel changes